packaging puppet modules

[Thomas Bendler]

2012/6/27 Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer at ktdreyer.com>

> I was looking briefly into packaging some Puppet modules, and I was
> curious if anyone else has gone down this road.
> [...]
> Does anyone have suggestions for package naming conventions? It looks
> like the upstream modules include the creators' names as part of the
> package names, which strikes me as a little verbose from the
> perspective of Fedora packaging.
>

I don't think that it make much sense to pack the modules as RPMs. Under
normal circumstances they must be customized in several different locations
and would only produce a lot of *.rpmnew files after upgrades without
proper function test possibilities. The more common way is to organize the
modules in a VCS.

Kind regards, Thomas
-- 
Linux ... enjoy the ride!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120716/9c13f432/attachment.html>