Package with no upstream (ftp)

[David Cantrell]

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:15:54PM +0000, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 18:21:32 GMT, David Cantrell wrote:
> > I do dislike having two line editing libraries, but whatever.
> 
> libreadline being full-fledged GPLv3+ makes it hard to justify in BSD
> projects. For such a commonly used library, it being GPL rather than
> LGPL makes little sense to me, but that's the way it is.

I understand the reason, but it's less of a technical reason and more just
a licensing annoyance.  That's all I wanted to point out.

-- 
David Cantrell <dcantrell at redhat.com>
Supervisor, Installer Engineering Team
Red Hat, Inc. | Westford, MA | EST5EDT