Mass rebuild for Fedora 18

[Dennis Gilmore]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

El Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:10:42 -0500
Bruno Wolff III <bruno at wolff.to> escribió:
> I'm seeing a few downgrades after the rebuild packages were tagged
> into rawhide. Were some updates missed and then replaced by packages
> from the rebuild that shouldn't have been?
> 
> Downgrading:
>   GMT                         x86_64      4.5.7-4.fc18
> rawhide      1.7 M GMT-common                  noarch
> 4.5.7-4.fc18        rawhide      4.1 M GMT-devel
> x86_64      4.5.7-4.fc18        rawhide       83 k
> GMT-doc                     noarch      4.5.7-4.fc18
> rawhide       33 M GMT-static                  x86_64
> 4.5.7-4.fc18        rawhide      542 k gmime
> x86_64      2.6.4-2.fc18        rawhide      177 k
> gmime-devel                 x86_64      2.6.4-2.fc18
> rawhide      153 k gmime-sharp                 x86_64
> 2.6.4-2.fc18        rawhide       37 k gwsmhg
> noarch      0.13-4.fc18         rawhide      252 k
> libmash                     x86_64      0.2.0-6.fc18
> rawhide       46 k m17n-contrib                noarch
> 1.1.13-4.fc18       rawhide      339 k m17n-contrib-extras
> noarch      1.1.13-4.fc18       rawhide       94 k
> mactel-boot                 x86_64      0.9-2.fc18
> rawhide       15 k rapidsvn                    x86_64
> 0.12.0-5.fc18       rawhide      354 k setroubleshoot-plugins
> noarch      3.0.25-2.fc18       rawhide      301 k
> svncpp                      x86_64      0.12.0-5.fc18
> rawhide       58 k

Most likely its due to the maintainers bumping f17 branch but not
making sure that master is correct also. with build having only ever
happened in f17 branch. Maintainers are responsible to make sure that
they work in master first.

Dennis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlAPLmwACgkQkSxm47BaWfeb+gCfXF/4mbv02dV5pa5S5SDP5hyc
STEAnR5Fsw6/urn07AKfjExFmKGlqyAy
=pFnu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----