Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:27:40AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> 
> I could have sworn I had, but releng trac disagrees, I seem to have
> stopped at the "mark retired in pkgdb" step.  Fixing.
> 
> But that raises its own question, why is that not sufficient to get
> the package blocked?  I mean, besides that the code currently doesn't
> implement that.  Who would own hooking up that bit of pkgdb to that
> bit of the compose process?
> 
Dennis and I talked about this at FUDCon Blacksburg and Dennis outlined
a plan for doing it in fedpkg.  I think it's just waiting on enough time to
finish/start coding it.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120726/f5c46e1f/attachment.sig>