[ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-18

[Jonathan Dieter]

On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 13:47 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Jonathan Dieter (jdieter at lesbg.com) said:
> >> On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:24 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >> > Package numptyphysics (fails to build)
> >>
> >> I've updated this to build and posted at
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843250
> >>
> >> If a package FTBFS and the current maintainer doesn't fix it, will we
> >> have a chance to take ownership of it before it gets blocked?
> >
> > I'd suggest finding a willing provenpackager to help you fix it
> > if you can't get the maintainer to apply or approve a comaintainership
> > request.
> 
> I'm a PP and I've helped with several of Lubo's pacakges in the past.
> I'm willing to help with this if you like.

That would be much appreciated, but it was meant to be more of a general
question about what the procedure is for blocking FTBFS packages.

Anyhow, if you're happy to apply the fix and Lubo doesn't mind, I sure
won't complain.  A number of my students love numptyphysics and I'd hate
to see it lost.

Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120726/e919f0e2/attachment.sig>