*countable infinities only

Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at chello.at
Fri Jun 1 16:01:10 UTC 2012

Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> My understanding is that some of the relevant legal minds believe that
> Microsoft's "you can disable it" concession forecloses the possibility
> of a successful legal attack on this— the law may care about the
> anti-competativeness of this stuff, but not so much as to care about a
> $99 signing key or some minor install time hurdle. (and the fact that
> fedora is willing to plan this probably justifies this position).
> It was arguably a strategic error to blow the whistle in advance and
> give Microsoft time to compromise. Their first attempt was much more
> likely to have created a civil cause of action as well as to have run
> afoul on antitrust grounds.   But I can hardly blame anyone for
> trying.  Hindsight 20/20 and all that.

If having the option to disable the crap even if it's enabled by default is 
sufficient to not be anti-competitive, then they would have done just that 
after being sued. So I don't think letting them go the most restrictive 
possible way and then sueing would have been any more effective than what 
actually happened.

        Kevin Kofler

More information about the devel mailing list