*countable infinities only
sclark at netwolves.com
Fri Jun 1 18:55:42 UTC 2012
On 06/01/2012 11:54 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Kevin Kofler<kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:
>> Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
>>> I don't want to jump in the technicality of this discussion, but I can
>>> only hope any "solution" that requires users to fiddle with BIOS
>>> settings in order to install Fedora won't be seriously considered as
>> Sorry, but it's the ONLY viable solution. Any "solution" that removes users'
>> freedom (and that's the case of ANY "solution" which leaves "Secure" Boot
>> enabled) cannot be seriously considered as viable.
> Secureboot support does *NOT* limit your freedom as long as it is
> optional (the default setting does not matter).
> You are either making more complex for everyone or for those that want
> do develop kernel development, run out of tree drivers etc.
> In case enabled secureboot is the only option (i.e we somehow refuse
> to boot with it disabled) then (and only then) you can talk about
> removed freedom otherwise this is just FUD.
What about on ARM?
Director of Technology
Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel