*countable infinities only

Orcan Ogetbil oget.fedora at gmail.com
Sat Jun 2 18:42:19 UTC 2012

On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 14:26 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> That is not the answer to my question (hint: read the question).
> Indeed, it is not, but do you really want to put in the CLA the
> responsibilities of every role past present and future available in the
> project ?
> Meaning that every time one is added, the CLA changes and thus that
> everyone has to re-sign it ?

Good questions. While I think the project could benefit from having at
least the top level responsibilities listed in the agreement, this
would end up burdening maintainers with legal responsibilities. I
don't honestly know what is the best way out.

At the same time I don't want to be obliged to support something I
don't want to. There are many more important things to deal with in
the distribution than a stupid secure boot feature.


More information about the devel mailing list