*countable infinities only

[Chris Murphy]

On Jun 1, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Peter Jones wrote:

> On 06/01/2012 01:22 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Is UEFI Secure Boot really the only way to prevent the problem it attempts to
>> solve, and if so, what about the plethora of BIOS hardware in the world
>> today, still even shipping as new systems? They're all unacceptably exposed?
>> Really?
> 
> That's the position Microsoft has taken, yes.

Do you share this position that Microsoft has taken? If not, why not? Do you think there are alternatives to UEFI Secure Boot - including a possible spec change?

Chris Murphy