supercat anybody working on it?
mschwendt at gmail.com
Tue Jun 5 08:49:35 UTC 2012
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:16:49 -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> On 6/2/2012 7:03 PM, Adrian Alves wrote:
> > am not following what u mean?
Please don't top-post, Adrian. Top-posting makes it much more difficult to
understand what you refer to, especially since you've asked a question.
> > On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 23:00:29 -0300, Adrian Alves wrote:
> >> done I built it, check this out:
> >> Spec URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/supercat.spec
> > Check this out:
> This means to read the following link because it describes a mistake
> that your spec file makes:
Exactly. After reading the following page, you should be able to find
the "unowned directory" in your package. At least try to find it.
And if you don't find it or if you think there is no unowned directory
in your spec file, mention that and it could be discussed further.
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories
> > And the following page is _not_ just for reviewers: ;-)
> This means to read the following link because it is wise to follow the
> packaging guidelines even before formally submitting a package for review:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines
A sponsored packager should be capable of reviewing others' packages,
for example to offer trading reviews. With the help of the ReviewGuidelines
page -- and particularly, the first MUST item on that list -- you should
find more mistakes in your supercat.spec file. It is good habit to not just
wait for a reviewer to do all the work, but perform a "self-review" and
declare whether a spec file is supposed to meet the guidelines or whether
there is something questionable you would like to discuss with a reviewer.
Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.3.7-1.fc17.x86_64
loadavg: 0.09 0.28 0.29
More information about the devel