glusterfs rename

Robyn Bergeron robyn.bergeron at
Tue Jun 5 22:56:13 UTC 2012

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at> wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at> wrote:
>> On 05/30/2012 02:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> Yes, for the Fedora side of things I think gluster 3.2 is the best
>>> strategy with a fedorapeople repo of 3.3 if it's considered worthwhile
>>> for those that wish to play. For gluster 3.3 I suggest a feature page
>>> for F-18 / rawhide. Is it feasible for the missing hekafs features to
>>> be merged into the 3.3 release train by October when F-18 is due to be
>>> released?
>> I was under the impression that glusterfs would be automatically carried
>> forward from f17 into f18, as it apparently was from f16 into f17.
> It will be carried forward but a major change of features and
> enhancements is worth doing a feature page to advertise the feature
> improvements (see the gnome feature page as an example[1] ), it's
> something for marketing to use and allows you to also detail things
> like the removal or merge of HekaFS.
>> F18 builds (of 3.2.6) are already available in koji. Until now I haven't
>> heard that a feature page is needed for 3.2.x (or 3.3.x) to be included in
>> f18. (But how to deprecate HekaFS on f18 once the glusterfs-3.3.0 build is
>> available.)
> See above for feature page details. For deprecate HekaFS you add the
> the appropriate obsoletes/provides as necessary to the gluster package
> and follow the process for removing/obsoleteing a package in the wiki.
>> The features that are in HekaFS (in f16 and f17) will get merged into
>> glusterfs-3.3.1+, as I indicated previously, but I won't promise how many of
>> them will be there when f18 ships. We certainly hope that all of them will
>> be, but we aren't making any promises.
> So that's something that can be documented in a feature page in the
> wiki and updated as things progress through both the gluster devel
> process and the fedora release process :)

Okay, as a slightly more detailed version:

You should follow the full feature process, to be put in the
FeatureList for F18.  If you want to see what that process looks like,
you probably want to look at this diagram:

And make your feature page according to the template noted on that
wiki page, and submit it to the feature wrangler (via a wiki category
change) so that they can have it approved by fesco, at which point it
can be added to the actual feature list :)


> Peter
> [1]
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at

More information about the devel mailing list