Intent to retire: nss_ldap

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 09:06 -0400, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> on our RHEL6 servers I'm still using nss_ldap for the hosts database:  
> we have a private network and I don't want to copy portions of 
> /etc/hosts around to our servers and putting them into DNS isn't really 
> an option for us.  I couldn't find an easy way to look up the data in 
> ldap for that data so I just stuck with nss_ldap for all of the 
> databases we needed.

Sure, but you should be able to use nss-pam-ldapd for that now. Have you
given that a look? (It's essentially the direct replacement for nss_ldap
and pam_ldapd supported by PADL).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120608/10f0cc3a/attachment.sig>