*countable infinities only

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Sun Jun 17 17:25:44 UTC 2012

Am 17.06.2012 19:16, schrieb Chris Murphy:
> On Jun 16, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 17.06.2012 01:14, schrieb Chris Murphy:
>>> Please provide an example of a better option, with sufficient detail as to constitute a successful relay of the baton.
>>> The point of the thread from the outset was to explore alternatives, but so far those alternatives are vaporware.
>> why do people not realize that with using microsoft keys
>> we are bringing them in the future to say "hey, look there
>> is no reason to disable secure-boot, so now we make it
>> mandatory without any option to disable it"
>> you do not believe this would happen?
> What I believe is irrelevant. You're proposing emotional reaction based 
> on a future hardware requirement that has not been proposed, 
> is not in the interest of Microsoft or their OEMs post-Windows 
> 8 requirement efforts requiring the disable feature, all for the singular 
> purpose of destroying a 1% market. And I think your proposal is highly 
> irrational and without merit

you are aware that on ARM platform is NO DISABLE SECURE BOOT allowed

this is not "future requirement"
this is CURRENT requirement for Win8 on ARM

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120617/68dfa0a7/attachment.sig>

More information about the devel mailing list