*countable infinities only

[Matthew Garrett]

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 08:54:08AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:

> There's every indication that were we to so choose, Microsoft would happily
> sign our binaries and allow us to boot on Secure Boot constrained ARM
> machines at no additional cost. We believe that without the guarantee that
> you can disable Secure Boot or use your own chain of trust, it isn't a
> platform we can or should support.

To emphasise this point - Microsoft will sign EBC objects, so it's not 
obvious that there's any way they *could* block a bootloader for ARM 
devices. We're just choosing not to.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org