Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2012-06-18)

Josh Boyer jwboyer at
Tue Jun 19 12:36:31 UTC 2012

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at> wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote on 19.06.2012 13:42:
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Till Maas <opensource at> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 01:10:34PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>>> * ticket 864 F18 Feature: DNF -
>>>>  (nirik, 17:44:17)
>>>>   * AGREED: Feature is approved (+8/0)  (nirik, 17:56:59)
>>> It would help a lot if a features are only approved, when they have
>>> descriptive names. From the message above it is completely unclear what
>>> was approved. But if the feature was named like for example "DNF package
>>> manager preview" there would be at least some information about what the
>>> DNF features is supposed to be.
>> Because you can't click on the link and read about the feature where
>> it describes this in detail?
> You can, but immediately getting the most relevant information makes
> life a bit easier for those on the receiving side. That is a nice
> gesture and shows that you value the time and interest of the readers.
> For afaics similar reasons most people here (you including) trim email
> replies and reply inline, as that makes communication a little bit
> easier, which is nice in these hectic times.

That's fine.  I don't consider it something required for approval
though.  It's at best a filter so people don't click links they don't
find interesting.


More information about the devel mailing list