Replacing grubby with grub2-mkconfig in kernel install process

drago01 drago01 at
Tue Jun 19 14:00:40 UTC 2012

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at> wrote:
> Am 19.06.2012 09:53, schrieb drago01:
>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Matej Cepl <mcepl at> wrote:
>>> On 18/06/12 09:30, drago01 wrote:
>>>> This would just result into stagnation while the competition invents
>>>> much better wheels and leave us behind.
>>> Abstracting for the sake of discussion from the particular case of grub2
>>> could you at least imagine new program which would be worse than the program
>>> it replaces?
>> Sure. But a new program can as well be better then the one it replaces
>> even if the other one has been in use for years. Not even trying to
>> improve the old or replace it with something better that comes up
>> means stagnation which is what I am objecting to.You have to make
>> changes to go forward.
> but it is NIT better

Read my mails in that thread again ... I did never specify the "it" I
just referred to your hand waving "but we have been using this for
years"  which is just nonsense.
If you have any other arguments fine ... but just stop the "we used
that for x years" nonsense.

More information about the devel mailing list