Default image target size [Was:Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2012-06-18)]

"J├│hann B. Gu├░mundsson" johannbg at
Tue Jun 19 22:14:01 UTC 2012

On 06/19/2012 09:03 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I'll add to that to note that we now have Xfce, LXDE and Sugar all on
> the DVD.

Which should have been added to the release blocker process when it got 
added there.

 From my point of view any handed out media at various events etc and 
what's on it should be considered release blocker.

> I've considered asking about making Xfce a blocking desktop, but I have
> no idea how the LXDE and Sugar communities are with helping testing,
> etc.
> It would mean added burden on QA folks to test more stuff, and added
> burden on maintainers of those desktops to create timely fixes for any
> blocker issues that come up.

There is no such thing as added burden on QA + Me and James had already 
solved that problem long ago but never found the time to implement it 
like so many other things because we both where a bit busy with our 

The solution was more or less this way

If an manpower to cover anything else then critical path became a 
concern we should fetch that manpower from the relevant SIG's community.

Basically the plan was to reach out for example to the 
Gnome/KDE/XFCE/LXDE/Sugar community's to ask for assistant to cover 
their relevant part of required testing if that was the case.

If you think about it who are better qualified and more willing to test 
those components other then the people that are using it on daily bases...


More information about the devel mailing list