Default image target size [Was:Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2012-06-18)]

"J├│hann B. Gu├░mundsson" johannbg at
Tue Jun 19 22:33:45 UTC 2012

On 06/19/2012 10:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Basically the plan was to reach out for example to the
>> >Gnome/KDE/XFCE/LXDE/Sugar community's to ask for assistant to cover
>> >their relevant part of required testing if that was the case.
>> >
>> >If you think about it who are better qualified and more willing to test
>> >those components other then the people that are using it on daily bases...
> This is fine in theory, but it doesn't hold up terribly well in
> practice. Just about every time we roll a TC/RC, I mail the lists for
> each desktop - GNOME, KDE, Xfce, LXDE, and Sugar - and ask for help in
> filling out the validation matrix. We get help fairly often for GNOME
> and KDE, and satellit_ usually covers Sugar, but we very rarely get
> anything for Xfce or LXDE.

Oh I'm pretty sure our solution works as well on paper as it does on the 

What's happening in the XFCE/LXDE community's is that the head of those 
SIG's aren't doing a great job of mobilizing their community to increase 
activities and participation in them which means that we ( QA  ) might 
have to step up and be more visible in those community ( that is if they 
cant increase more activities in them ).


More information about the devel mailing list