default DNS caching name server on Fedora ?
danw at redhat.com
Thu Jun 21 13:32:22 UTC 2012
On 06/20/2012 07:09 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> (also, an aside: why the heck do resolvconf and dnssec-trigger require
> an interface name??? DNS information has nothing do with network
> interfaces, despite some DNS info coming from interface-specific sources
> like DHCP...)
resolvconf requires an interface name for the same reason NMDnsManager
does, because it behaves in exactly the same way as NMDnsManager. (It
keeps track of multiple DNS configurations, merges them together into a
single resolv.conf, and lets you add new ones and remove old ones in any
order.) The NM resolvconf plugin is broken in how it uses resolvconf.
More information about the devel