DHCPv6 *still* broken for F17 alpha

Paul Wouters pwouters at redhat.com
Thu Mar 1 15:52:07 UTC 2012

On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Dan Williams wrote:

> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
>> * Jerry James
>>> Interesting.  I'm seeing kind of the inverse problem:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771130.  Could that be
>>> related to the issues discussed in this thread?
>> Hard to tell, without (preferably debug-level) logs. I have the same
>> problem you're describing occur in 0.9.2-1 (see bug #797524), but I've
>> not seen it with 0.9.3-0.2.git20120215.
> 0.9.4 snapshots do not require both methods to complete (with either
> success or failure) before saying the machine is connected.  Thus if
> IPv4 completes first, NM will say it's connected, and continue IPv6 in
> the background.  And vice versa.

But that does not yet address the dhcpv6 ip6tables ACCEPT rule that is
missing right?


More information about the devel mailing list