Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy

Ralf Corsepius rc040203 at
Fri Mar 2 13:34:26 UTC 2012

On 03/02/2012 12:12 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 03/02/2012 11:02 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>> Ok, so you'll automatically start non-responsive maintainer process,
>> because maintainer didn't work on a one bug. But he might be working on
>> different component for whole month. He might be working on a new
>> upstream release and not paying attention to low priority bugzillas.
>> You should take more parameters than one bug to kick someone from Fedora.

The real point is: There is no strict parameter set, because the reasons 
for why reports get not addressed are manifold.

> This is based on more then one bug against one component and through
> observation in several release cycles.
> If an maintainer does not want to be affected by the automatic non
> responsive process all he would have to do would simply be something
> like changing the report status from new to assigned and leave feed back
> on it.

I other words, all is proposal would be doing is to cause bureaucratic 


More information about the devel mailing list