[ACTION NO LONGER REQUIRED] Retired packages for F-17
pbrobinson at gmail.com
Wed Mar 7 18:19:39 UTC 2012
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Till Maas <opensource at till.name> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 06:36:23PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > Peter Robinson (pbrobinson at gmail.com) said:
>> >> It was my understanding that packages that are FTBFS prior to F-15 (ie
>> >> not had a successful build in F-15 or later)
>> > It's done off the F15FTBFS bug. If these don't have bugs blocking that,
>> > they won't get picked up.
>> Right, I did that from koji, not sure how the ftbfs bug was done.
> At least for aircrack-ng from your list no FTBFS bug has been filed,
> therefore I do not see any reason to remove it from Fedora. And in case
> it really does not build, I expect a bug report.
There hasn't been FTBFS bug reports since Matt stopped doing them due
to lack of time, the maintainer would have got failed builds for the
mass rebuild and should have investigated as part of "maintaining" the
More information about the devel