libbluray soname bump

[Julian Sikorski]

W dniu 07.03.2012 10:13, Xavier Bachelot pisze:
> On 03/06/2012 11:49 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>> W dniu 11.12.2011 13:01, Xavier Bachelot pisze:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> libbluray has made its first official release a few days ago. The soname
>>> was bumped to 1.0.0 just before the release, in order to make sure it's
>>> incompatible with older snapshots they have produced. The snapshots I've
>>> made and packaged for Fedora are compatible with the release, so
>>> Fedora/RPM Fusion packages should be fine after a simple rebuild.
>>>
>>> I would like to have a clean start with this library and have the
>>> updated package pushed to devel, but also to all currently active
>>> releases ( F-16, F-15 and EL-6), despite the soname breakage. Now that
>>> upstream is ready to push releases, I think it will be easier to keep
>>> the package in good shape if we follow them.
>>>
>>> Affected packages are as follow :
>>>
>>> For F17 and F16 :
>>> gvfs    (fedora)
>>> mplayer (rpmfusion-free)
>>> xbmc    (rpmfusion-free)
>>>
>>> For F15 :
>>> mplayer (rpmfusion-free)
>>> xbmc    (rpmfusion-free)
>>>
>>> EL-6 doesn't have any affected package.
>>>
>>> Please let me know if you're ok with that, and I'll proceed with the
>>> builds and the build overrides request.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Xavier
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> So what happened with pushing libbluray to older Fedora branches? I am
>> fine with rebuilding mplayer, do other apps rebuild cleanly?
>>
> 
> gvfs was rebuilding fine against either the older or the newer API and
> the maintainer was ok to rebuild.
> 
> xbmc 10.1 needed some patches. They were applied. They are not needed
> for xbmc 11, so depending on the version in F16 and F15, they might
> still need to be applied. The maintainer was ok with rebuilding too. See
> http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2011-December/011019.html
> 
> 
> mplayer needed a patch too, but it wasn't applied. The patch might not
> be needed anymore as mplayer has been updated to a more recent snapshot.
> See
> http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2011-December/011017.html
> 
> 
> The whole discussion is in rpmfusion-devel archives :
> http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2011-December/010981.html
> 
> 
> The vlc maintainer was looking at pushing vlc 2.0 to F16 and maybe F15
> too. This release can use libbluray.
> 
> For completeness, xine-lib 1.2 and xine-lib 1.1.21 can also use
> libbluray. 1.1.21 is not released yet and I'm not sure what the state of
> xine-lib in Fedora/RPM Fusion is at the moment anyway. An update to 1.2
> for F17 was discussed, but this version cannot be easily split into a
> patent-free and a patent-encumbered package, so that will need to be in
> RPM Fusion and it will drag a couple other packages too.
> 
> Regards,
> Xavier
OK, so basically everything which depends on libbluray *currently* can
be patched and rebuilt. Shall we do the update then? I can take care of
applying the patch to mplayer since I am its new co-maintainer.

Julian