Non-free tarball checked in
mattia.verga at tiscali.it
Mon Mar 12 17:17:03 UTC 2012
Il 12/03/2012 13:33, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:19:38 -0400
> Stephen Gallagher<sgallagh at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 13:01 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
>>> On 03/12/2012 03:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>>> I checked in a tarball for egoboo that turned out to have a
>>>> non-free (noncommercial restriction) font file in it. The tarball
>>>> has only been used for local builds (no scratch-builds). Do I
>>>> need to remove this tarball from the lookaside cache? If so how
>>>> do I do it? The hash is e6f3130695d297dcd9fe74e50bd59b68.
>>> Does that mean any source tarballs containing non-free content
>>> should be repacked by the maintainer even if the source rpm doesn't
>>> install/use any of the non-free content? I've been recently
>>> commenting on a review where this might apply.
>> Yes, see
> Also you should neverdo a scratch build with prohibited code/items.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
And what about for pre-built binary files contained in source that are
not installed in the final rpm (ex. deleted in the %setup stage)? Should
the source be purged from those?
More information about the devel