Non-free tarball checked in
a.badger at gmail.com
Tue Mar 13 16:32:42 UTC 2012
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:21:52PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Mattia Verga <mattia.verga at tiscali.it> wrote:
> > And what about for pre-built binary files contained in source that are not
> > installed in the final rpm (ex. deleted in the %setup stage)? Should the
> > source be purged from those?
> If the licensing is such that they can't be redistributed, yes.
And just to be clear for people who search the mailing list archives later:
* If the licensing is okay, the source tarball doesn't need to be repacked
with those files excluded.
* The binaries (for a definition of binaries that includes code/executable
content but not necessarily data) do need to be removed from the build
environment in the %prep stage of the rpm build.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the devel