[Test-Announce] Test Day 2012-03-15: GNOME Shell and Extensions

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Tue Mar 13 17:14:19 UTC 2012

On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 19:36 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 11:07 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > 
> > I know this should most likely be directed at upstream Gnome, but would
> > it be possible to redesign extensions.gnome.org so that it's... usable?
> > I mean, it's a list of extensions, ten to a page, ordered by popularity,
> > name or number of downloads.
> > 
> > Would it be so hard to add tags or categories of functionality? Right
> > now, I have to read through fourteen pages (and growing!) to get any
> > idea of whether an extension happens to provide a feature I might want.
> > 
> > I like gnome-shell, and I'd like to tweak it a little bit to fit my
> > needs better. But the extension website is so difficult to navigate that
> > it's really a deterrent. It will only get worse as people continue to
> > write new extensions (which, because of the default ordering of
> > "popularity" will always show up in the later pages of the site first).
> Thanks for the feedback.
> We have recently added search to the website, and some other
> improvements may still land before we remove the 'alpha' label from it.
> If you want to report your problem in more detail, feel free to go to
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=website&component=extensions.gnome.org
> - or just walk by Jaspers desk.

Ask and ye shall receive:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120313/430778fa/attachment.sig>

More information about the devel mailing list