DHCPv6 *still* broken for F17 alpha
lars.seipel at googlemail.com
Wed Mar 14 19:47:23 UTC 2012
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 13:36:06 Dan Williams wrote:
> Whether we care enough about this regression (if you want to call it
> that) versus enabling default IPv6 connectivity I don't know, I tend to
> think we suck up the regression.
Please do. The current behaviour of tearing down working IPv6 connections is
just painful IMHO.
> Next up, since AFAIK fdxx:: is a non-routable private network (like 10/8
> right?) should NM say that we're only connected to a site-local network
That's probably the best thing to do, in both cases, IPv4 and IPv6. What NM
definitely should not do is say that the connection failed while it's perfectly
connected to a local network where there is just no link to the internet.
More information about the devel