does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf
davej at redhat.com
Fri Mar 16 17:06:14 UTC 2012
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett <mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org> said:
> > No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy.
> Why not?
> For example, I use a commercial backup program that makes extensive use
> of IPC and needs the msgmni and msgmnb limits raised beyond the default
> values. Why shouldn't they be able to include that change in their RPM?
What happens if two packages want to set a sysctl to different values ?
More information about the devel