does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf
alsadi at gmail.com
Fri Mar 16 19:42:50 UTC 2012
> What happens if two packages want to set a sysctl to different values ?
that's why they are prefixed with numbers, the higher number will take
sometimes we have conventions for number ranges like this
50 User overrides
51 Local system overrides
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net> wrote:
> Once upon a time, Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net> said:
> > Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett <mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org> said:
> > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:57:13AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > > > Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett <mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org> said:
> > > > > No package should be automatically changing the sysrq policy.
> > > >
> > > > Why not?
> > > >
> > > > For example, I use a commercial backup program that makes extensive
> > > > of IPC and needs the msgmni and msgmnb limits raised beyond the
> > > > values. Why shouldn't they be able to include that change in their
> > >
> > > Where did I say they shouldn't?
> > You mean other than the quoted line?
> My appologies; I misread "sysrq" as "sysctl".
> Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net>
> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
> I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel