RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements
jkeating at redhat.com
Tue Mar 20 18:35:49 UTC 2012
On 3/20/12 8:37 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> I do not like this requirement. This seems to be specifically provided
> to block the possibility to have ARM as a primary architecture if we do
> not want to support just one or two ARM platforms. I do not really see a
> problem in limiting platforms during rawhide development and branched
> development. Additional platforms could be enabled for final builds
> before the release freezes and for update builds.
That just means those platforms are getting tested at the same time the
rest of the distribution is, and then when you turn it on you suddenly
find bugs that need to be fixed which invalidates testing done already.
Playing the "turn it on late" game is a non-starter IMHO.
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
More information about the devel