RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements
kevin at scrye.com
Tue Mar 20 19:35:26 UTC 2012
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:14:14 +0100
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:
> It doesn't make sense to discuss requirements for becoming a primary
> architecture without discussing whether it should be considered in
> the first place. I don't see ANY reasons why it's needed. And as I
> wrote in my first reply in this thread...
Yes, we know your position. No need to continue to reply to every email
in the thread repeating it. If you have some new info to add by all
means do so.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the devel