RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Tue Mar 20 19:35:26 UTC 2012

On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:14:14 +0100
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:

> It doesn't make sense to discuss requirements for becoming a primary 
> architecture without discussing whether it should be considered in
> the first place. I don't see ANY reasons why it's needed. And as I
> wrote in my first reply in this thread... 


Yes, we know your position. No need to continue to reply to every email
in the thread repeating it. If you have some new info to add by all
means do so. 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120320/356de513/attachment.sig>

More information about the devel mailing list