RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Wed Mar 21 00:23:35 UTC 2012

On 3/20/12 5:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> But sure, in theory, we can do just about anything for a secondary arch
> that we do for a primary arch, I don't think there's any technical
> barrier to us doing update karma for ARM and test days for ARM and a
> release validation process for ARM and all the rest of it. It's just a
> question of motivation and personpower.

My point is that the motivation and personpower can come independent of 
whether arm is a PA or an SA.  As you say, no technical barrier.

Jesse Keating
Fedora -- FreedomĀ² is a feature!

More information about the devel mailing list