ARM as a primary architecture
jwboyer at gmail.com
Wed Mar 21 00:24:54 UTC 2012
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:
> Peter Jones wrote:
>> In yesterday's FESCo meeting I told you I'd make a list of specific issues
>> I have with the current proposal for ARM as a primary archictecture. There
>> are some places where I think the current proposal fails to deal with some
>> necessary aspects of becoming a primary architecture, and some places
>> where I don't think the approach is quite right.
> How about: "support for the main hardware features on commonly-used hardware
> is Free Software, and included in the upstream software (kernel, X.Org X11,
> CUPS, SANE etc.) where appropriate"? Right now, this is clearly NOT the case
> for OpenGL on ARM, so by promoting ARM, we'd promote proprietary (graphics)
> driver use.
I think that's going slightly too far. We certainly wouldn't suggest to our
users that they install a proprietary driver on any of the Fedora project
websites or wikis. It's probably more accurate to classify your concern as
ARM graphics being unsupported or at best crippled.
More information about the devel