RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

Tomas Mraz tmraz at redhat.com
Wed Mar 21 07:51:52 UTC 2012

On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:44 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Now the ultra ridiculous: How about secondary architecture
> requirements demoted as-is to tertiary. And create substantially more
> aggressive requirements for secondary architecture (in which ARM would
> be placed), yet are not identical requirements to primary architecture
> requirements?

Yes, this might be actually the best short-term path. Or rather than
demoting the other secondary architectures to tertiary status just have
different scale for various secondary architectures in terms of official
infrastructure support. I can see automatic spawning of secondary builds
for ARM in the main koji instance, use of main bodhi, etc., etc.
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
                                              Turkish proverb

More information about the devel mailing list