ARM as a primary architecture
awilliam at redhat.com
Thu Mar 22 04:03:28 UTC 2012
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 03:00 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Exactly! Ultimately what we need is FESCo to document what are the
> > requirements of being promoted to a primary architecture and then it's
> > the ARM SIGs job of ensuring they adhere to the requirements, provide
> > viable workable alternatives that are acceptable to FESCo, or provide
> > proof that the requirement will be met within an agreed time frame.
> ARM should most definitely NOT be approved as a primary architecture before
> all the requirements are actually met!
> We have seen what happened when the EU took Greece's word on the promise
> that they'd eventually meet the Maastricht criteria. Let's not do the same
> mistake in Fedora!
You heard it here first, folks: the next economic crisis will be caused
by ARM as a primary arch.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
More information about the devel