Broken dependencies: parcellite

[Michael Schwendt]

On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:41:37 +0100, CW (Christoph) wrote:

> Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 18:30 +0100 schrieb Thomas Spura:
> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert> wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 12:52 +0000 schrieb buildsys:
> > >>
> > >> parcellite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> > >> On i386:
> > >>       parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
> > >>       parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
> > >>       parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
> > >>       parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
> > >>       parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
> > >>       parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
> > >>       parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires libX11.so.6()(64bit)
> > >> Please resolve this as soon as possible.
> > >
> > > I resolved this on March 10th with 1.0.2-0.2.rc5
> > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=306351
> > > but still I keep getting these mails. Why? And why is the script
> > > complaining about the F17 package when there is a F18 one in rawhide?
> > 
> > Looks like the script looks for fc17, but says it's rawhide...
> 
> Yeah, except that I get another mail for F17.
> 
> > (There are still broken deps in fc17, because your update is not yet stable:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3933/parcellite-1.0.2-0.2.rc5.fc17
> > )
> 
> I was aware of the F17 update not yet being pushed. The funny (?) thing
> is that the F17 mails stopped after the update was in testing, only
> rawhide continues and I have no idea why.

Are you sure about that?

parcellite is still listed in the "F-17 Branched report" broken deps,
but not in the "rawhide report".

The Branched report covers F17 + updates, but not updates-testing.