ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)
forum at hubbitus.com.ru
Sat Mar 24 08:13:16 UTC 2012
24.03.2012 01:30, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
>> 08.03.2012 20:24, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 03/08/2012 04:18 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
>> 08.03.2012 01:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
>> 05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:11 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
>> 05.03.2012 01:04, Sérgio Basto пишет:
>> On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33 +0100, Mario Santagiuliana wrote:
>> In data domenica 26 febbraio 2012 18:39:14, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
>> ImageMagick-6.7.6-5 will land to rawhide in short time. Soname change
>> happened (.so.5), so dependency rebuild needed.
>> Does it land on F17 ? , if not, why ?
>> Do you think it have worth? I ready to do it.
>> yes , not in koji ?
>> Ok, that's done.
>> If you're going to push this to F17, please submit a buildroot override and
>> we're going to need to rebuild everything that needs it in F17.
>> Do you mean I should submit ticket for that? Unfortunately I'm not
>> provenpackager and have no such capability to rebuild deps. But rуфвн вщdo
>> that or anything to help.
>> Anyone can submit a buildroot override now here:
>> Then you should notify all relevant package owners that they need to do a
>> I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17 techne-0.2.1-4.fc17
>> gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17 autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1
>> ImageMagick-18.104.22.168-3.fc17 with tat build overrides but got error from bodhi
>> what ImageMagick-22.214.171.124-3.fc17 update already exists. Should I delete it
>> first and unpushing is not enough?
> You should be able to re-push the same update that you once canceled,
> after adding the other packages.
hubbitus does not have commit access to perl-GD-SecurityImage
hubbitus does not have commit access to techne
I have not provenpackager rights indeed. I kindly ask FESCO to grant its
me, but it not in that moment in any case. If I had them, I could
compile all the packages on their own, without asking anyone.
Please could you say how I may push such update? May someone help with
it if my rights is not enough?
>> Pfstools update also already exists -
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfstools-1.8.3-7.fc17 . So it does
>> not included there. I hope its landed in repos in parallel and that deletion
>> is not necessary.
> Let's hope the pfstools maintainer is aware of this issue.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel