tilda unmaintained? (was: Re: Examining -static package build timestamps in koji)

[Johannes Lips]

Well I would like to see tilda maintained in fedora. In this bugreport I
created the patch and asked a provenpackager to apply it, which never
actually happened.
I could of course apply for co-maintainership but I doubt that the
maintainer would answer in a timely manner, like on most of his bugreports.
Johannes

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Michael Schwendt <
mschwendt at fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 04 May 2012 18:30:58 +0200, PM (Petr) wrote:
>
> > >     21 link with flex libs        <-- flex doesn't change often, though
> >
> > I believe that libfl.a hasn't really changed in Fedora at all.  It
> > exports two symbols, totaling something like 10 lines of actual code.
> > Absence of client rebuilds is just not a problem in this case.
> >
> > >     tilda-0.9.6-6.fc16.src  older than  flex-2.5.35-15.fc18.src.rpm
> > >       231 days
>
> Yeah, I figured so much.
>
> Interestingly, "tilda" has failed to rebuild two times in a row according
> to koji status, and its bug status page doesn't look too pretty:
>
>    http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/tilda
>
> There's even somebody interested in co-maintaining it, but hasn't got
> a response in over a month: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/781875
>
> --
> Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.3.4-3.fc17.x86_64
> loadavg: 0.12 0.04 0.05
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120504/86ef5f41/attachment.html>