Proposed F18 feature: MiniDebugInfo
jakub at redhat.com
Tue May 8 06:41:17 UTC 2012
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 08:34:57AM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> Its true that that is all the information you need from the
> process/core. But you need to have the rest of the information availible
> *somewhere*, such as on a global retrace server or just having it
> locally in the minidebuginfo. The later is far more robust and simple.
> It lets you directly get a reasonable backtrace given *only* the actual
> binaries in the running process.
What is far more robust and simple is something we simply have to agree to
More information about the devel