EPEL 6 cmake RPATH deafults?!?
jonathan.underwood at gmail.com
Tue May 8 11:11:36 UTC 2012
On 8 May 2012 01:41, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have no problems reviewing it but do we need to seek any higher
> level approval?
I am not sure, but I don't think so - it meets the EPEL requirement of
not replacing a RHEL package. This is why I didn't add a virtual
provides for cmake, as this, I think, would overstep that line.
More information about the devel