Proposed F18 feature: MiniDebugInfo
alexl at redhat.com
Wed May 9 07:27:57 UTC 2012
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 08:23 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> Because ABRT has not yet met its expectations we should
> provide at
> least this temporary solution before ABRT gets fixed.
> So you agree?
I agree that ABRT should be better, but I don't agree that having local
minimal debug info is only a temporary solution. Various problems that
ABRT have are inherent to it requiring a network connection and a
centralized server setup, which is not something you can fix. So, having
at least some level of quality local backtraces will still be good even
if ABRT becomes better.
More information about the devel