license in rpm spec file for dual license?

Jon Ciesla limburgher at
Wed May 16 13:50:20 UTC 2012

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at> wrote:
> GlusterFS-3.3.0, which is to GA soon, has had (another) license change. Much
> of it now under a dual license: GPLv2 or LGPLv3+, with a small number of
> pieces still remain under GPLv3+.


License: GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+

modulo the compatibility of that combination, which I *think* is OK
but I am open to correction:


> What is the correct way to represent this in the spec file?
> --
> Kaleb
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at

in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie

More information about the devel mailing list