license in rpm spec file for dual license?

[Jon Ciesla]

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote:
> GlusterFS-3.3.0, which is to GA soon, has had (another) license change. Much
> of it now under a dual license: GPLv2 or LGPLv3+, with a small number of
> pieces still remain under GPLv3+.

IMO:

License: GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+

modulo the compatibility of that combination, which I *think* is OK
but I am open to correction:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPLCompatibilityMatrix

-J

> What is the correct way to represent this in the spec file?
>
> --
>
> Kaleb
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



-- 
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie