x32 abi support?

drago01 drago01 at gmail.com
Wed May 16 19:37:42 UTC 2012

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Alexander Larsson <alexl at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 15:30 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:28:31PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> > Mhmm, so I was under the impression that x32 was mostly about increasing
>> > the scalability of virtualized systems. i.e. run a higher number of
>> > x32 containers/VM on an x86_64 host. Most server software that is run in
>> > containers/VMs does not require 64bit address space, and hence using x32
>> > for them should be quite benificial so that you can run more
>> > containers/VMs per host. After all this would reduce memory and CPU
>> > consumption of each, and due to smaller memory usage also result in less
>> > IO?
>> I was under the impression that it was to make Android work better on
>> Intel. Scalable VMs are an interesting idea, but for a typical session
>> how much RAM are we talking about?
> If you look at some contemporary VM hosting providers, like e.g.:
> http://bloggerkhan.com/vps-hosting-vps-servers/185
> You'll see that most of them are in the 384-1024 meg of ram range, and
> almost none are larger than 4 gigs. I'm sure most of these run 32bit
> images, but the hosts are likely 64bit, so it seems to make quite some
> sense to use an x32 ABI here.

Can x32 run i686 software (multilib) ?
Because not being able to run existing software might be a reason for
many to want such a host.

More information about the devel mailing list