Stop the git abuse

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
>>> And definitvely, for me, (and probably only for me), git is really
>>> not a good tool for spec maintenance.
>>
>> Not duplicating the changelog would help.  There's little reason to
>> have a changelog in git which is then manually copied into
>> %changelog.
>
> +1, for me - GIT is the authority for change logs, not SPEC...

-1 changelogs are manually written documents and source files.
A database's (git), temporary meta information is irrelvant.