Feature template update [was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule...]

drago01 drago01 at gmail.com
Thu Nov 1 18:41:21 UTC 2012


On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:09:21PM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> > That sounds good. Maybe recast those ideas as three levels?
>> >  - Critical Path Feature
>> >  - Other Enhancement Feature
>> >  - New Leaf Feature
>> We were thinking with a few folks more about "Self contained feature"
>> but yeah, there's a lack of real definition.
>
> I think "Leaf" is better than "Self contained", since it's unlikely for the
> feature to have zero outside dependencies. I think it'd be fine for such a
> feature to rely on small changes to existing packages (version updates,
> say).

I'd argue that this isn't a "feature" ... otherwise we could advertise
every version upgrade as feature.
If it does not affect a large amount of users it is simply a version
upgrade not a "fedora feature".


More information about the devel mailing list