Feature template update [was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule...]

[Jaroslav Reznik]

----- Original Message -----
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Matthew Miller
> <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:09:21PM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> >> > That sounds good. Maybe recast those ideas as three levels?
> >> >  - Critical Path Feature
> >> >  - Other Enhancement Feature
> >> >  - New Leaf Feature
> >> We were thinking with a few folks more about "Self contained
> >> feature"
> >> but yeah, there's a lack of real definition.
> >
> > I think "Leaf" is better than "Self contained", since it's unlikely
> > for the
> > feature to have zero outside dependencies. I think it'd be fine for
> > such a
> > feature to rely on small changes to existing packages (version
> > updates,
> > say).
> 
> I'd argue that this isn't a "feature" ... otherwise we could
> advertise
> every version upgrade as feature.
> If it does not affect a large amount of users it is simply a version
> upgrade not a "fedora feature".

The question is - how do you know if it affects large amount of users,
it's not an important one, without letting people know, there's such
feature?

Jaroslav

> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel