Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 11/02/2012 03:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 03:12:56PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>>>> As soon as an feature depends on other components or several other
>>>> components and their maintainers involvement/participation, then for
>>>> example the unresponsive maintainers policy conflicts with the
>>>> feature process given our relatively short development cycle. ( in
>>> Can you explain that a little more? Do you mean the policy is too slow?
>> Dead/un-maintained packages need to be removed/reassigned at the
>> very *beginning* of an new development cycle so feature owners and
>> others working in the community are dealing with active and actively
>> maintained packages.
> Okay. But I'm having trouble seeing how that's a blocker for incremental
> improvement to the features process.
>

It's pretty apparent that there is no point in working with the feature 
process et all if those issues aren't address first no matter how many 
incremental improvements you make to the process or when you do it for 
that matter.


JBG