Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

[Aleksandar Kurtakov]

Hmm, actually I have new proposal. 
Policy about active/inactive maintainers should be decided only by actual maintainers. In the true meritocracy way - if you don't maintain anything you don't have a say.

Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Reindl Harald" <h.reindl at thelounge.net>
> To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Saturday, November 3, 2012 4:47:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how	to install into a LVM partitions (or
> RAID))
> 
> 
> 
> Am 03.11.2012 15:38, schrieb Emmanuel Seyman:
> > * "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" [02/11/2012 20:34] :
> >>
> >> That package would hardly be un-maintained if it has
> >> co-maintainers
> >> now does it...
> > 
> > Absolutely. Hence my request that any process we put in place be
> > package-focused rather than maintainer-focused
> 
> why?
> how will you do this?
> if there is nothing to change on a apckage it is at it is
> 
> if any maintainer not login he is INACTIVE
> if a package has more maintainers it is no problem retire the
> inactive maintainer
> if a package has only one maintainer and he is gone away the package
> has to be retired
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel