Feature template update [was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule...]

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 11/05/2012 07:52 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> A crit path update that affects, say, two packages and nothing else,
> could be "approved by default" as well.  Many of the crit path
> features however affect a large or extremely large package set (e.g.
> the sysv->systemd script migration), in which case explicitly
> involving every maintainer as the feature owner before even proposing
> the feature wouldn't scale; that's where FESCo does need to step in as
> a more efficient way to represent the large group of packagers.

Case in point for F18 [1] and perfect example of one thing that should 
have been completed within one release cycle...

JBG


1.http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PackagePresets