Revamping the non responsive maintainer process

[Marcela Mašláňová]

On 11/06/2012 04:32 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 11/06/2012 01:07 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>> Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
>>
>> Could you create fesco ticket for this package? I proposed usage of
>> the script in Johann's ticket
>> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/967#comment:7 Imho it might be
>> better to give acl to more people, then only punish developers.
>
> If that's the plan why not drop the ownership model ( a.k.a dictatorship
> model ) all together so everyone can contribute to every package?
>
> If the answer to the above is no we cant/wont do that then we need
> proper cleanup process "to punish developer" as you put it failing to
> understand that packagers/maintainers aren't' the only one in the
> community dealing with packages ( QA,Releng,Infra etc )...
>
> JBG

The "dictatorship" is there to safe us from reckless changes. If Fedora 
allow everyone to patch everything, then we have to check packagers more 
thoroughly than give them a few reviews usually of one language.

I safe my comments for tomorrows FESCo because we probably can't reach 
consensus.

Marcela